jazzoLOG: Magnetic Resonance With God    
 Magnetic Resonance With God4 comments
picture5 Mar 2004 @ 02:18, by Richard Carlson

At a given moment I open my eyes and exist. And before that, during all eternity, what was there? Nothing.

---Ugo Betti

A monk clamored to ask Chao-Chou the most important principle of Zen. The Master excused himself by saying, "I must now go to urinate. Think, even such a trifling thing I have to do in person."

---Zen mondo

Step by step, the early morning breeze.

---Hakuin

Spiritual neurology
A mystical union

Mar 4th 2004
From The Economist print edition

A small band of pioneers is exploring the neurology of religious experience

The renowned French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot once scribbled some notes while under the influence of the psychedelic drug mescaline. Colleagues were puzzled because among the scribbles was the incongruous statement, written in English, “I love you Jennifer”. Still more puzzling was the question: who was Jennifer? That was not the name of his wife nor of anyone else they thought he knew. Despite the mystery, Dr Charcot's colleagues never thought to question the scientific value of the experiment.


The same cannot be said of Mario Beauregard, a brain-imager from the University of Montreal, who has also experimented with mescaline. But that is because Dr Beauregard is interested in one particular, and far more contentious, aspect of the mescaline experience—the capacity of the drug to inspire feelings of spirituality or closeness to God. It was experiments of the type carried out by Charcot that opened up the possibility of investigating spirituality in a scientific manner, by showing that it could be manipulated. Dr Beauregard is following up on these by trying to discover where in the brain religious experience is actually experienced.

In the first of what he hopes will be a series of experiments, Dr Beauregard and his doctoral student Vincent Paquette are recording electrical activity in the brains of seven Carmelite nuns through electrodes attached to their scalps. Their aim is to identify the brain processes underlying the Unio Mystica—the Christian notion of mystical union with God. The nuns (the researchers hope to recruit 15 in all) will also have their brains scanned using positron-emission tomography and functional magnetic-resonance imaging, the most powerful brain-imaging tools available.

The study has met with scepticism from both subjects and scientists. Dr Beauregard had first to convince the nuns that he was not trying to prove or disprove the existence of God. Scientific critics, meanwhile, have accused him of being too reductionist—of pretending to pinpoint the soul in the brain in the same way that the Victorians played phrenology as a parlour game by feeling the contours of each others' skulls to find a bulge of secretiveness or a missing patch of generosity.

Dr Beauregard does not, in fact, believe there is a neurological “God centre”. Rather, his preliminary data implicate a network of brain regions in the Unio Mystica, including those associated with emotion processing and the spatial representation of self. But that leads to another criticism, which he may find harder to rebut. This is that he is not really measuring a mystical experience at all—merely an intense emotional one.

This is because the nuns are, so to speak, faking it. They believe that the Unio Mystica is a gift of God and cannot be summoned at will. Most of them have only experienced it once or twice, typically in their 20s. To get around this, Dr Beauregard has drawn on previous experiments he carried out with actors, which showed that remembering an intense emotional experience activates the same brain networks as actually having that experience. In effect, he has asked the nuns to method act, and they are happy to comply.

God and the gaps

Andrew Newberg, a radiologist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, who has scanned the brains of Buddhists and Franciscan nuns in meditation or at prayer, is familiar with such criticism. He says that, because religious experience is not readily accessible, unusually high standards of experimental rigour are demanded of this kind of research. “We have frequently argued that many aspects of spiritual experiences are built upon the brain machinery that is used for other purposes such as emotions,” he says. “Very careful research will need to be done to delineate these issues.”

But that is not a reason for shying away from them, says Olaf Blanke of the University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland, whose paper in the February edition of Brain describes how the brain generates out-of-body experiences. He points out that plenty of research has been done into another kind of bodily illusion, phantom limbs. This has identified the brain mechanisms responsible, and even suggested treatments for these disabling “appendages”. The same cannot be said of out-of-body experiences, which can also be disturbing, but occupy a neglected position between neurobiology and mysticism.

Having subjected six brain-damaged patients to a battery of neuro-imaging techniques, Dr Blanke's group concludes that damage at the junction of two lobes of the brain—the temporal and parietal—causes a breakdown of a person's perception of his own body. The boundary between personal and extrapersonal space becomes blurred, and he sees his body occupying positions that do not coincide with the position he feels it to be in.

Some patients give this a mystical interpretation, some do not. What is interesting is that several of the patients suffered from temporal-lobe epilepsy. An association between this kind of epilepsy and religiosity is well-documented, notably in a classic series of neurological papers written by Norman Geschwind in the 1960s and 1970s. Dr Blanke argues that all the lobes of the brain play a part in something as complex as religious experience, but that the temporo-parietal junction is a prime node of that network.

The parietal lobe is thought to be responsible for orienting a person in time and space, and Dr Newberg also found a change in parietal activation at the height of the meditative experience, when his volunteers reported sensing a greater interconnectedness of things. At the end of each recording session, Dr Beauregard asks the nuns to complete a questionnaire which gauges not only feelings of love and closeness to God, but also distortions of time and space. “The more intense the experience, the more intense the disorganisation from a spatio-temporal point of view,” he says. Typically, time slows down, and the self appears to dissolve into some larger entity that the nuns describe as God.

Whether the Unio Mystica has anything in common with out-of-body experiences, or even phantom limbs, remains to be seen—though all are certainly mediated by the brain. According to Dr Blanke, this is only just starting to become an accepted topic of research in neuroscience. Perhaps its acceptance will depend ultimately on how the knowledge is used. Dr Beauregard may have done himself a disservice by arguing that mystical union should not be reserved for the spiritual few, but should be made available to everyone, for the benefit of society. Perhaps, like Charcot, he should stick to describing it, however incongruous the result may be.

Copyright © 2004 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group.
[link]



[< Back] [jazzoLOG]

Category:  

4 comments

5 Mar 2004 @ 05:26 by jazzolog : Milarepa
http://www.namsebangdzo.com/Merchant2/images/thangkas/thangka10975th.jpg

Speaking of resonance, today is Milarepa Day in Tibet. If this saintly figure is not known to you, do look into his life story~~~

http://www.cosmicharmony.com/Av/Milarepa/Milarepa.htm  



5 Mar 2004 @ 06:59 by martha : Connection
thanks Jazz, very interesting article...I believe though in the experiments they are not getting the entire picture. When one has a mystical experience more then just the brain is involved. The entire body or parts of the body besides the brain experiences the mystical sensation. This is especially true in the heart chakra area. So I suspect the results would be even more interesting if they could also somehow notice the energy shift that occurs throughout the body. The brain is only one aspect of the whole and will only give a partial truth to explain these experiences.  


5 Mar 2004 @ 14:05 by spiritseek : meditation...
during mine I feel the chakras were used like a battery charging my power to OBE or astral travel etc.By traveling and being seen by someone at that location would mean part of my body traveled, not the physical part of course.I do believe it takes the whole body to produce those effects. What enhanced my meditations was to raise my kundalini through the spine, I had remarkable things happen with that.
This article will produce more questions but at least someone is looking for answers. Lifes full of myseries.  



11 Mar 2004 @ 01:21 by b : Brains
Meat.  


Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other entries in
24 Nov 2008 @ 10:57: American Justice: Any Hope?
24 Jun 2008 @ 11:43: George
20 Mar 2008 @ 10:13: Barack Obama: Rock Church, Rock
11 Jan 2008 @ 10:07: Full Frontal Feminism
7 Nov 2007 @ 21:08: Blackwater, Blackwater Run Down Through The Land, Part 2
29 Sep 2007 @ 12:38: "Black Waters, Black Waters Run Down Through The Land"
4 Jul 2007 @ 10:50: Justice Texas Style
7 Apr 2007 @ 11:05: There Are No Conspiracies
20 Feb 2007 @ 10:50: Hot Internet Discourse
7 Dec 2006 @ 11:03: Our Beautiful Planet And The Little States Upon It



[< Back] [jazzoLOG] [PermaLink]?