MEGATRENDS: Mining The Thought Stream    
 Mining The Thought Stream8 comments


Mining The Thought Stream
148 Comments
by Erick Schonfeld on February 15, 2009

What if you could peer into the thoughts of millions of people as they were thinking those thoughts or shortly thereafter? And what if all of these thoughts were immediately available in a database that could be mined easily to tell you what people both individually and in aggregate are thinking right now about any imaginable subject or event? Well, then you'd have a different kind of search engine altogether. A real-time search engine. A what's-happening-right-now search engine.

In fact, the crude beginnings of this "now" search engine already exists. It is called Twitter, and it is a big reason why new investors poured another $35 million into the two-year-old startup on Friday. Twitter is not the only company trying to solve this problem. Facebook, FriendFeed, and even Google are trying to crack it, but Twitter has a decided advantage in that it is capturing the vast majority of the real-time thought stream on the Web (because more people enter their thoughts directly into Twitter's database than any other, and are doing so at an increasing rate).

What makes Google and other search engines so valuable is that they capture people's intent—what they are looking for, what they desire, what they want to learn about. But they don't do a great job at capturing what people are doing or what they are thinking about. For thoughts and events that are happening right now, searching Twitter increasingly brings up better results than searching Google.

Whether you want to know how people are mentally gearing up for this week's Mobile World Congress in Barcelona or what they are thinking about today's Ireland vs. Italy rugby match, searching Twitter will give you a pretty good smattering of sentiment and opinion. It is also a lot faster at getting out the essential details about breaking news, such as the Mumbai attacks or the plane that landed on the Hudson.

Twitter's search engine is powered by Summize, a startup it acquired last July. But it also developed a feature called Track, currently disabled but coming back soon, that allowed people to follow the mention of specified keywords. John Borthwick, an investor in Summize (and thus now an investor in Twitter), explained in a blog post earlier this month ago why he thinks that "Twitter search changes everything." Excerpt:

Imagine you are in line waiting for coffee and you hear people chattering about a plane landing on the Hudson. You go back to your desk and search Google for plane on the Hudson — today — weeks after the event, Google is replete with results — but the DAY of the incident there was nothing on the topic to be found on Google. Yet at [link] the conversations are right there in front of you. The same holds for any topical issues — lipstick on pig? — for real time questions, real time branding analysis, tracking a new product launch — on pretty much any subject if you want to know whats happening now, search.twitter.com will come up with a superior result set.

. . . How is real time search different? History isn't that relevant — relevancy is driven mostly by time. . . . This reformulation of search as navigation is, I think, a step into a very new and different future. Google.com has suddenly become the source for pages — not conversations, not the real time web. What comes next? I think context is the next hurdle. Social context and page based context. . . . Twitter search today is crude — but so was Google.com once upon a not so long time ago.

Twitter may just be a collection of inane thoughts, but in aggregate that is a valuable thing. In aggregate, what you get is a direct view into consumer sentiment, political sentiment, any kind of sentiment. For companies trying to figure out what people are thinking about their brands, searching Twitter is a good place to start. To get a sense of what I'm talking about, try searching for "iPhone," "Zune," or "Volvo wagon".

Why can't Google simply index Twitter? It does, but its search results give more weight to links than to time. It could create a new search product along the lines of Blog Search or News search that is geared more towards Micro-messaging services such as Twitter, FriendFeed, and the rest. But what it really needs to go beyond simply indexing Twitter after the fact. IVP partner, and Twitter investor, Todd Chaffee, suggests:

If they were really smart they could partner with Twitter and make Twitter their real-time feed.

Doing that would require Google to "affirm Twitter's dominance in this category and the importance of the Twitter data stream," contends Borthwick. But so far, Google has pretty much flubbed this opportunity to open up real-time search. It bought Twitter competitor Jaiku, only to shut it down. And now it is hoping to create a counterweight to Twitter's growing strength in real-time data by open-sourcing Jaiku. Good luck with that one.

Listening to Twitter's investors gives a good sense of how they think Twitter can become a game-changer in real-time search. While it is instructive, it is also important to note that much of this vision has yet to materialize. Twitter's current search is extremely crude, as Borthwick readily admits. It simply brings up the most recent Tweets with the keyword you are looking for. There is no ranking or clustering beyond that.

An undifferentiated thought stream of the masses at some point becomes unwieldy. In order to truly mine that data, Twitter needs to figure out how to extract the common sentiments from the noise (something which Summize was originally designed to do, by the way, but it was putting the cart before the horse—you need to be able to do simple searches before you start looking for patterns). But what is the best way to rank real-time search results—by number of followers, retweets, some other variable? It is not exactly clear. But if Twitter doesn't solve this problem, someone else will and they will make a lot of money if they do it right.

[link]



[< Back] [MEGATRENDS]


8 comments

7 Mar 2009 @ 08:37 by susannahbe : Thanks for that...
I am a fan of twitter - it is 'immediate', it is a flow of consciousness. I loved what jmarc said about increasingly being able to do exactly 140 character posts, (subconscious adaption to circumstance). I think it is a reflection of, and a outward sign of new level of evolution of the collective psyche.

On a lighter note - here is why I like it - [link]

(by the way, there is nothing wrong with cut and paste, it is spreading information.)  



7 Mar 2009 @ 18:45 by vaxen : Yes mam...
Thanks susannah. I love your tweets and blogs BTW. :)

 



7 Mar 2009 @ 21:18 by susannahbe : Thank you
for reproducing my 'self portrait' :-)
A larger version and more details on this image can be found here - [link] (scroll down the page)  



10 Mar 2009 @ 07:20 by vaxen : Yes!
And thankyou for mentioning that it is a self portrait. I love your art-work susannah...


For every beauty
there is an eye somewhere
to see it.

For every truth
there is an ear somewhere
to hear it.

For every love
there is a heart somewhere
to receive it.

-Ivan Panin  



11 Mar 2009 @ 08:10 by deepwater : Mapping the memeplex
This is very interesting as it speaks to a thought I have been holding for a while, that it would be very revealing to be able to make a schematic diagram representing the current (and ongoing) status of the memeplex(s) as they unfold and as they are at any given moment, hopefully such information would be used for some higher purpose than marketing...

I imagined that such information may give us an insight into the 'state' of the global mind and thereby guide us in responding appropriately in order to guide it toward higher levels of consciousness.
Hoping for too much? Someone has to hold the vision!  



11 Mar 2009 @ 13:31 by vaxen : "Higher purpose
than marketing..." There's the rub, deepwater. Twitter is, perhaps, the best Web 2.0 example of a memeplex writing it's way towards Marketroid heaven. Lots of tools being developed with which to measure the consumer heartbeat but at this point twitter remains 'open and free.' Yet, I fear, the die has been cast yet for the discerning it is a die that we know all too well.

It has the smell of the Serenghetti plains all over it and of the ANC's murderous henchmen who smile brilliantly whilst lighting the Mandeloid necklace afire. Ah yes...the holy of holies...the marketplace.

No you are not hoping for too much. Be, do, have. Now we are lighting the fires (nodal points) within the world brain to realise that we are more than 'consumers!' Look at what the marketroids have done to the world. The marketplace can, again, be a place of delight and exchange. Where people 'meet' and exchange 'goods.'

Corporate slavery and mad post industrial dis-ease will give way, beyond the chemtrails, to the realisation that we do not want our children bathed in oil slick like some poor Canadian Geese thinking it has found haven only to be confronted by the insanity of a man like Richard Cheney and Haliburton...

Incidentally Twitter just received 35 million investment dollars to continue, maintain, development...  



18 Mar 2009 @ 00:17 by maxtobin : And become opened beyond
the source (code) for control purposes? A Higher purpose in deed.

The way through is not held in the mind (except perhaps in a much broader way) it is in th hearts and souls of all incarnate beings IMHO (trees, flowers, birds and bees included!!)  



13 May 2009 @ 07:24 by vaxen : Yeah Max...
I must say that I agree with you 100%... the way through. Thanks for that.  


Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


[< Back] [MEGATRENDS] [PermaLink]?