MEGATRENDS: America's Rottweiler    
 America's Rottweiler 8 comments
America's Rottweiler
By Uri Avnery
Gush Shalom

Saturday 26 August 2006

In his latest speech, which infuriated so many people, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad uttered a sentence that deserves attention: "Every new Arab generation hates Israel more than the previous one."

Of all that has been said about the Second Lebanon War, these are perhaps the most important words.

The main product of this war is hatred. The pictures of death and destruction in Lebanon entered every Arab home, indeed every Muslim home, from Indonesia to Morocco, from Yemen to the Muslim ghettos in London and Berlin. Not for an hour, not for a day, but for 33 successive days - day after day, hour after hour. The mangled bodies of babies, the women weeping over the ruins of their homes, Israeli children writing "greetings" on shells about to be fired at villages, Ehud Olmert blabbering about "the most moral army in the world" while the screen showed a heap of bodies.

Israelis ignored these sights, indeed they were scarcely shown on our TV. Of course, we could see them on Aljazeera and some Western channels, but Israelis were much too busy with the damage wrought in our Northern towns. Feelings of pity and empathy for non-Jews have been blunted here a long time ago.

But it is a terrible mistake to ignore this result of the war. It is far more important than the stationing of a few thousand European troops along our border, with the kind consent of Hizbullah. It may still be bothering generations of Israelis, when the names Olmert and Halutz have long been forgotten, and when even Nasrallah no longer remember the name Amir Peretz.

IN ORDER for the significance of Assad's words to become clear, they have to be viewed in a historical context.

The whole Zionist enterprise has been compared to the transplantation of an organ into the body of a human being. The natural immunity system rises up against the foreign implant, the body mobilizes all its power to reject it. The doctors use a heavy dosage of medicines in order to overcome the rejection. That can go on for a long time, sometimes until the eventual death of the body itself, including the transplant.

(Of course, this analogy, like any other, should be treated cautiously. An analogy can help in understanding things, but no more than that.)

The Zionist movement has planted a foreign body in this country, which was then a part of the Arab-Muslim space. The inhabitants of the country, and the entire Arab region, rejected the Zionist entity. Meanwhile, the Jewish settlement has taken roots and become an authentic new nation rooted in the country. Its defensive power against the rejection has grown. This struggle has been going on for 125 years, becoming more violent from generation to generation. The last war was yet another episode.

WHAT IS our historic objective in this confrontation?

A fool will say: to stand up to the rejection with a growing dosage of medicaments, provided by America and World Jewry. The greatest fools will add: There is no solution. This situation will last forever. There is nothing to be done about it but to defend ourselves in war after war after war. And the next war is already knocking on the door.

The wise will say: our objective is to cause the body to accept the transplant as one of its organs, so that the immune system will no longer treat us as an enemy that must be removed at any price. And if this is the aim, it must become the main axis of our efforts. Meaning: each of our actions must be judged according to a simple criterion: does it serve this aim or obstruct it?

According to this criterion, the Second Lebanon War was a disaster.

FIFTY NINE years ago, two months before the outbreak of our War of Independence, I published a booklet entitled "War or Peace in the Semitic Region". Its opening words were:

"When our Zionist fathers decided to set up a 'safe haven' in Palestine, they had a choice between two ways:

"They could appear in West Asia as a European conqueror, who sees himself as a bridge-head of the 'white' race and a master of the 'natives', like the Spanish Conquistadores and the Anglo-Saxon colonists in America. That is what the Crusaders did in Palestine.

"The second way was to consider themselves as an Asian nation returning to its home - a nation that sees itself as an heir to the political and cultural heritage of the Semitic race, and which is prepared to join the peoples of the Semitic region in their war of liberation from European exploitation."

As is well known, the State of Israel, which was established a few months later, chose the first way. It gave its hand to colonial France, tried to help Britain to return to the Suez Canal and, since 1967, has become the little sister of the United States.

That was not inevitable. On the contrary, in the course of years there have been a growing number of indications that the immune system of the Arab-Muslim body is starting to incorporate the transplant - as a human body accepts the organ of a close relative - and is ready to accept us. Such an indication was the visit of Anwar Sadat to Jerusalem. Such was the peace treaty signed with us by King Hussein, a descendent of the Prophet. And, most importantly, the historic decision of Yasser Arafat, the leader of the Palestinian people, to make peace with Israel.

But after every huge step forward, there came an Israeli step backward. It is as if the transplant rejects the body's acceptance of it. As if it has become so accustomed to being rejected, that it does all it can to induce the body to reject it even more.

It is against this background that one should weigh the words spoken by Assad Jr., a member of the new Arab generation, at the end of the recent war.

AFTER EVERY single one of the war aims put forward by our government had evaporated, one after the other, another reason was brought up: this war was a part of the "clash of civilizations", the great campaign of the Western world and its lofty values against the barbarian darkness of the Islamic world.

That reminds one, of course, of the words written 110 years ago by the father of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, in the founding document of the Zionist movement: "In Palestine, we shall constitute for Europe a part of the wall against Asia, and serve as the vanguard of civilization against barbarism." Without knowing, Olmert almost repeated this formula in his justification of his war, in order to please President Bush.

It happens from time to time in the United States that somebody invents an empty but easily digested slogan, which then dominates the public discourse for some time. It seems that the more stupid the slogan is, the better its chances of becoming the guiding light for academia and the media - until another slogan appears and supersedes it. The latest example is the slogan "Clash of Civilizations", coined by Samuel P. Huntington in 1993 (taking over from the "End of History").

What clash of ideas is there between Muslim Indonesia and Christian Chile? What eternal struggle between Poland and Morocco? What is it that unifies Malaysia and Kosovo, two Muslim nations? Or two Christian nations like Sweden and Ethiopia?

In what way are the ideas of the West more sublime than those of the East? The Jews that fled the flames of the auto-da-fe of the Christian Inquisition in Spain were received with open arms by the Muslim Ottoman Empire. The most cultured of European nations democratically elected Adolf Hitler as its leader and perpetrated the Holocaust, without the Pope raising his voice in protest.

In what way are the spiritual values of the United States, today's Empire of the West, superior to those of India and China, the rising stars of the East? Huntington himself was compelled to admit: "The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do." In the West, too, women won the vote only in the 20th century, and slavery was abolished there only in the second half of the 19th. And in the leading nation of the West, fundamentalism is now also raising its head.

What interest, for goodness sake, have we in volunteering to be a political and military vanguard of the West in this imagined clash?

THE TRUTH is, of course, that this entire story of the clash of civilizations is nothing but an ideological cover for something that has no connection with ideas and values: the determination of the United States to dominate the world's resources, and especially oil.

The Second Lebanon War is considered by many as a "War by Proxy". That's to say: Hizbullah is the Dobermann of Iran, we are the Rottweiler of America. Hizbullah gets money, rockets and support from the Islamic Republic, we get money, cluster bombs and support from the United States of America.

That is certainly exaggerated. Hizbullah is an authentic Lebanese movement, deeply rooted in the Shiite community. The Israeli government has its own interests (the occupied territories) that do not depend on America. But there is no doubt that there is much truth in the argument that this was also a war by substitutes.

The US is fighting against Iran, because Iran has a key role in the region where the most important oil reserves in the world are located. Not only does Iran itself sit on huge oil deposits, but through its revolutionary Islamic ideology it also menaces American control over the near-by oil countries. The declining resource oil becomes more and more essential in the modern economy. He who controls the oil controls the world.

The US would viciously attack Iran even it were peopled with pigmies devoted to the religion of the Dalai Lama. There is a shocking similarity between George W. Bush and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, The one has personal conversations with Jesus, the other has a line to Allah. But the name of the game is domination.

What interest do we have to get involved in this struggle? What interest do we have in being regarded - accurately - as the servants of the greatest enemy of the Muslim world in general and the Arab world in particular?

We want to live here in 100 years, in 500 years. Our most basic national interests demand that we extend our hands to the Arab nations that accept us, and act together with them for the rehabilitation of this region. That was true 59 years ago, and that will be true 59 years hence.

Little politicians like Olmert, Peretz and Halutz are unable to think in these terms. They can hardly see as far as the end of their noses. But where are the intellectuals, who should be more far-sighted?

Bashar al-Assad may not be one of the world's Great Thinkers. But his remark should certainly give us pause for thought.


Uri Avnery

Go to Original... [link]



14 Sep 2006 @ 15:21 by jazzolog : One Would Hope
if a nation is going to create and follow policy that alienates the rest of the world, the policy should be sound and open to debate. What seems difficult with the foreign policies of both Israel and the United States is they don't seem available for debate and disagreement. Ensuing hatred may be bitter disappointment. Nations are fools to disregard such warnings. No nation should just try to do the "popular" thing necessarily...unless they are forced by some kind of domination.


Nations, all of them, are 'legal fictions.' The 'Law of Nations' is an interesting study. For more interesting, and related, material please cf. in especial 'Towards a North American Union.' Lysandor Spooner, of course, is always a good read too. ;)

Don't try to make sense of it all but please do be prepared for the onslaught which I'm sure you can already 'feel.' ;)

Your Orwell unlock code is: 323136  

14 Sep 2006 @ 18:09 by b : No one is born a hater
Each baby is fresh,new to the world of Earth. They are taught hate.
What we have on Earth are the nations. They are not going to dissapear overnight. Each nation is an entity. Some allign with others, some do not.
Unfortunetly the UN is the only place where debate among nations can occur. Debate about nations is always in the media. Individuals are not permitted to debate nations unless they are a dictator.


Nations are ''legal fictions.'' The word 'person' means 'facade.' Not the same as flesh and blood being. Beings in their caricatures, persons, most assuredly 'can' debate, via their 'STRAWMAN interface,' any pseudo, made up or fictitious, entity.

The being is not the body. The progression is: Being, Mind, Body, Product. Hatred most assuredly can be 'passed on' not only through the genetic entity which controls the autonomous nervous system and the body, in general, but via the thetan line as well. Remember those ''thetan wars?''  

14 Sep 2006 @ 19:17 by jobrown : Rather than...
love, than money, than fame, give me truth." -Henry David Thoreau
b, you are absolutely right!: " No one is born a hater. They are taught hate".

Uri Avnery's "State of Chutzpah" 09-09-2006 is the best description of 'chutzpah,' when used by a sick mind, I ever read. And what a person with so much impudency, need of self-aggrandisment/ego, greed, hatred, and overall detestation for life can create - havock and destruction!...

(Uri Avnery makes it very clear that "there is healthy 'chutzpah' and not so healthy." Well, it isn't Chutzpah, per se, but a person's own emotional health regardless where it is applied! )

Interestingly enough Avnery's article, specific to the political evils in Israel, when you change the names can apply to political evils here in America as well!

Two different States, different humans, and "carbon-copy" political application - which, to me, just proves how it is that the frequency people come from determines how they act.

These people are spiritually very sick people. Their state of mind, emotional health, eventually, will destroy it all for all the rest of us, unless the people who have awakened to see this truth don't do something now, objecting as strongly as it takes, even civil uprising in every country on Earth.

As far as America goes, I'm asking: What-in-the-world are we, in America, waiting for? Ain't gonna be Santa Clause coming soon.

"The mangled bodies of babies, the women weeping over the ruins of their homes, Israeli children writing "greetings" on shells about to be fired at villages, Ehud Olmert blabbering about "the most moral army in the world" while the screen showed a heap of bodies." --- U.A.


14 Sep 2006 @ 23:11 by swan : .


Ahlen (welcome) wa (and) mootshakr (deep thanks) sachibti (my [female (case ending)] friend)...  

19 Sep 2006 @ 19:45 by hgoodgame : :)
And some interesting links in the comments section too!
Thanks H.G. for klicking... ;)  

19 Sep 2006 @ 20:43 by jobrown : and here's some more
for those who are interested in learning "how" these people are sick -or more correctly: how they apply their utter selfishness under the cover of 'officially' accepted "Illness-label"

Very important web-sites:

( vax, if you don't like these, just remove them! But I think there's a lot to learn from these sites about the crooks and their cronies)/ Ttys/ A-d
Thanks, A-d...
I like them just fine. ;)  

20 Sep 2006 @ 05:58 by jobrown : Thanks, Vax,
you are always so kind!
Look what I just ran into.

I'm at loss for words! These sick people's insanity goes so deep! It is beyond my comprehension! "The West" was "won" way back when, with incomprehensible cruelty and the biggest, most cruel and systematic genocide the World has ever witnessed, but.. have Americans not risen in their Humanity one single iota???
I guess I'll know in a few days!

Oh, A-d, it isn't as if this country has never, under all those other ''lilly white'' murderers, employed the same tactics of persuasion. To blame it all on Bush is to miss a great point...

America has been a fascist country for a very, very, long time. The truly guilty would like to blame it all on one man thus escaping the scrutiny of those who relentlessly research the truth.

You'll notice that Dolphy gets blamed for all the atrocities of World War two yet the Jewish Stalin gets barely a peep. Why is this? Torture is older than HU-Man cattle (Kind). What torture illicits can by no means be called 'intelligence.' Yet that is the age old phoney excuse for it. All governments are evil! We are uniqely equipped to live without governments.

Self government is the goal we all share innately. All the varied accoutrement of so called ''society'' but pits one being against another in an endless game of lies and deceit whilst those who profit by it all get by unscathed for they are masters at insinuating their parasitic souls into the vast corpus of humanity yet...

We shall overcome them all. We do not need the parasites called religion and government. The two always go hand in hand. The priestcraft and the butchering murderers who enforce that brand of slavery for a very handsome profit indeed. Their day is coming. Thanks for the links A-d.  

23 Sep 2006 @ 23:18 by jobrown : Hey, Vax,
I say what Heidi San said to me the other day when she sent this: "You'll get a kick out of this one"

....apropÄ Crooks and Rottweilers and "Rottweilers" ; ). ( I am cinvinced you'll agree with me/us that the similarities here are stunning, by any measure! *!* )
Here we go: A burglar broke into a house one night. He shined his flashlight around, looking for valuables; and when he picked up a CD player to place in his sack, a strange, disembodied voice echoed from the dark saying, "Jesus is watching you."

He nearly jumped out of his skin, clicked his flashlight off, and froze. When he heard nothing more after a bit, he shook his head, promised himself a vacation after the next big score, then clicked the light on and began searching for more valuables.

Just as he pulled the stereo out so he could disconnect the wires, clear as a bell he heard, "Jesus is watching you."

Freaked out, he shined his light around frantically, looking for the source of the voice. Finally, in the corner of the room, his flashlight beam came to rest on a parrot.

Did you say that?" he hissed at the parrot.

"Yep," the parrot confessed, then squawked, "I'm just trying to warn you."

The burglar relaxed. "Warn me, huh? Who in the world are you?"

"Moses," replied the bird.

"Moses?" the burglar laughed .. "What kind of people would name a bird Moses?"

"The kind of people that would name a Rottweiler Jesus." : )

All Cool here. / Ttys/A-d
Glad to know that. Jesus is watching you! ;) Hahahahahahahaha
Thanks for the laugh yun'z. ;)

Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

[< Back] [MEGATRENDS] [PermaLink]?