The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.
The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.
To silence critics, McNiven has successfully passed a credible lie detector test regarding his participation in the study as well as other specific orders given to him by his superiors in case of a real attack on the Twin Towers.
The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.
McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that "the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976."
"I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100 story building to the Twin Towers," recalled McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.
"He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we devised in the 1976."
Since that ominous realization, McNiven has devoted his entire life to alerting the American public about the similarities between 9/11 and the 1976 study without much success, his story basically being ignored by politicians and the mainstream media.
"Why am I doing this? Why have I spent every waking hour trying to bring this story to the American people?" asked McNiven, claiming he still is following a strange direct military order given to him more than 25 years ago.
"During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I'd go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers."
However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds.
"I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people.
"I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded - never - because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people."
Besides taking a lie detector to verify his story, McNiven has made public a detailed list of about 40 names of those individuals who took part in the mock terrorist plan, including Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt. Middleton, Sgt. Arroyo and many others.
"There were also people from the Defense Department and the CIA who were monitoring the study, but I wasn't able to get their names," he added.
Some of McNiven's most recent assignments with the Defense Department include work on the Northwest Drug Task Force and various other drug smuggling and weapons trafficking cases.
March 9, 2005
"If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." (George H.W. "Poppy" Bush)
24 Mar 2005 @ 21:32 by jstarrs : You can tell it's disinfo...
...when they say 'an outspoken critic'
A critic, ok.
But, duh, outspoken?!!!!!
24 Mar 2005 @ 23:51 by : No...
Names are names. You're just looking for 'disinfo' cause you're obviously a Bushite and New World Order plover. You probably live in France and eat Pouffe. Look at your own proclivity to dis and or mis inform, swabby. ;) McNiven can be 'sourced.' Can you?
"Besides taking a lie detector to verify his story, McNiven has made public a detailed list of about 40 names of those individuals who took part in the mock terrorist plan, including Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt. Middleton, Sgt. Arroyo and many others..."
"These are the harsh words of Timothy McNiven, an outspoken critic of the President's handling of 9/11 and a 29-year U.S. Defense Department operative still under contract with the government."
U.S. Defense Department operative. Check it out. Or don't. It's all the same to me. You might also wish to check out the battalion etc., But it's easier just to say 'duh' and think that that is cool. It isn't. When you get Nuked by Iran (The real 'tar-get' for the Afghanistan-Iraq 'Police actions') have a snail on me, fried.
Outspoken makes it 'dis-info?' Come on, now, go back to Department 20 and reread the manual on Psy-Ops.
25 Mar 2005 @ 23:13 by astrid : Nicaragua, Bosnia,Iraq,
WTC, Vietnam, French Revolution & Russian, WWI & II ... all into being in same fashion: "Wag The Dog" / "Canadian Bacon" fashion!!!.....an' people say; "it's OK as long as it's not (DONE; the CRIMES COMMITTED -like murder, torture etc) in my Backyard... I can -and will- turn a Blind Eye to it all.... ehhheeehhh"
But then when it does happen in "one's own Backyard".... Americans still say it's OK.... as long as "it was you(r family member ) and not me/ my family member..."
So, WHEN is it & WHAT does it take to be TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT?????
27 Mar 2005 @ 09:04 by jstarrs : Vax...
...you're getting too serious again.
You missed the slight element of satire in my post.
27 Mar 2005 @ 17:47 by : Yo!
Not in the least, I just added some of my own. I think you missed the slight element of sat-ire in my little burst of flamma eteritatis. ;) There is no news like no news and we are all information junkies. Damn!
We are 'Sun Comm' and 'we get it.'
2 Apr 2005 @ 22:01 by frank4zen @18.104.22.168 : WAR ON TERROR IS A SHAM
The "war on terror" is a war on a tactic. It's like FDR asking for a declaration of war against "surprise attacks," instead of Japan, our actual enemy in that war.
Our real enemy after the 9/11 attacks wasn't "terror" -- that's a tactic -- it was Al QaedaWe aren't much fighting Al Qaeda. We're fighting in Iraq -- a country that had no weapons of mass destruction, and no demonstrated link to Al Qaeda.
When was the last time we went to war and didn't raise taxes to finance it? Answer: Never in our history until now. Only a "RIGID IDEOLOGUE" would propose tax cuts in "time of war."
But then, the WAR ON TERROR IS A SHAM, so they didn't really cut taxes in "time of war," did they? See how it works? See how the frames support each other?