|18 May 2011 @ 18:51, by Geral W. Sosbee|
DOJ advises me today of the legal basis for some electronic surveillance operations. [Note that a decade ago the fbi began their fraudulent investigation and even a law suit could not force the fbi to admit to the existence of any crime by this Target; see:
The US Department of Treasury has formulated rules for monitoring and tracking suspects; these rules are then used by the fbi in order to fraudulently obtain a court order (under the guise of
' evidence of a crime' allegedly committed by the Target).
The fbi never charges a crime because no crime exists, but the phony investigation and covert crimes against the Target by the fbi are permanent and as I have shown not subject to review by even the US Supreme court.
Then, the fbi thugs and criminals without time limits proceed to try to arrest or kill the Target, or at least force the Target into suicide.See: [link]
Below is the link to the Treasury rule; if the link does not work, then enter the following words in Google for the link: "federal rules to non consensual audio monitoring."
The *DOJ visit (& sublimnal suggestion to me) is shown below:
160.9 Electronic Tracking Devices.
TIGTA utilizes two types of electronic tracking devices in support of field investigations:
160.9.1 Electronic Tracking Device Authorizations. The installation and use of tracking devices is covered under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and specifically pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3117, Mobile Tracking Devices.
GERAL W. SOSBEE vs. fbi
By Location > Visit Detail
Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
ISP US Dept of Justice
State : Virginia
City : Arlington
Time of Visit May 18 2011 11:56:05 am
Search Words federal rules to non consensual audio monitoring
Visit Entry Page sosbeevfb/non-consensual